Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

International family lawyer cannot help father see children when long distance involved

International family lawyer cannot help father see children when long distance involved

According to an international family lawyer, there are many cases of parental alienation and abduction across borders. Divorced fathers involved in international marriage are granted the right to have their children visit their home country during summer breaks or even have their children relocate to their home country for better educational opportunities after reaching a certain age. However, the execution of such rulings is often challenging, and they may not be enforced as intended.

This situation can leave fathers initially feeling relieved and content with the legal decision, only to later experience surprise, confusion, and disappointment when they realize that the legal system struggles to enforce its own ruling. This highlights the need for better enforcement mechanisms and support for parents in navigating complex custody and visitation issues across international borders.

Next Summer? International family lawyer should not be that optimistic because…

It’s important to acknowledge that, while the legal system believes it has done the best to protect the best interests of children, there can be cases where it falls short. There can be issues with enforcing visitation agreements, particularly when the mother refuses to cooperate and when there are long distances involved.

In situations where the mother tries to prevent the child from visiting the father, it can be very frustrating for the father who is trying to maintain a relationship with their child. Usually, the mother’s excuse is that “the kid doesn’t want to go”. When the child expresses a reluctance to see the father, the situation becomes even more complex. It can be difficult for the court to determine whether the child’s feelings are genuine or if they are being influenced by the mother.

What can the father do? it’s essential for the father to document any instances of the mother blocking visitation and to seek legal advice on how to enforce their visitation rights. A family law attorney might help to navigate the complexities of the legal system and advocate for the father’s rights to see their child. But chances are dim.

The timing of visitation rulings also plays a crucial role in the enforcement of a court’s decision. A ruling stating that a child can see their father next week is significantly different from a ruling allowing visitation next summer. Enforcing a ruling with a longer time frame can be challenging and may become nearly impossible in some cases.

A fresh approach: children’s intention should not be granted

We need to approach this issue with a fresh perspective. For instance, consider a scenario where both parents would undoubtedly block their child’s access to alcohol, cigarettes, and marijuana during their early teenage years. Similarly, when a child expresses that they do not want to see their father, it could be as harmful as early exposure to addictive substances. Parents should not always permit their children to make decisions that could negatively impact their well-being.

The reason some judges or law enforcement officials may choose to listen to a child’s wishes not to see their father could be attributed to a lack of personal parenting experience. They may fail to recognize that being separated from one of their parents can be as detrimental to the child’s well-being as accessing addictive substances.

In conclusion, there is a need for a more comprehensive approach to addressing the challenges of enforcing visitation rights, particularly in cases where one parent obstructs the relationship between the child and the other parent. Considering the child’s best interests, it is crucial to find a balance between respecting their wishes and ensuring that they maintain a healthy relationship with both parents.